New York Bikes! Official Website of the New York Bicycling Coalition
About UsNewsBicycling Clubs and EventsProgramsInformation for AdvocatesBetter BicyclingBetter RoadsResources
News
» News & Issues
» Press Releases
» Newsletters
» Alerts
» Forums

New York Bicycling Coalition’s Objectives for Re-Authorization of TEA-21

For questions, please contact Ivan Vamos, Legislative Director, at 518-436-0889

The New York Bicycling Coalition hopes to influence the reauthorization of the nation’s surface transportation law, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). To this end, NYBC urges the New York Congressional delegation to pursue the following objectives in regard to pedestrian and bicycle programs within the renewed TEA-21, or TEA-3:

1)      Enhance the Safe Routes to School Program: many areas in New York City’s borough of the Bronx have benefited from this program, allowing children to go to school in safer, more ecological ways. They want the fun and flexibility of getting there on their own and being able to stop at the store or a friend’s house on the way home. Many families in suburban areas would also like to decrease their dependence on motorized transportation, gain relief from vehicular congestion and parking problems, and seek a healthier lifestyle.  We ask that TEA-3 allocate more funding to:

a)      Expand Safe Routes to School in urban areas where population density and high use make this type of program highly successful;

b)      Initiate Safe Routes to School in suburban areas with research on walk, cycle, and drive needs of various-sized communities, followed by programs tailored to educate parents and children in which routes are best for walking or biking;

2)      Create a bike-friendly road and transportation system: Although ISTEA and TEA-21 made substantial gains in this area, much of our transportation systems are still unfriendly to cyclists. On-street cycling lanes need further development in all towns and cities so people can safely ride on a daily basis from home to work, to school and to shop. Although many inroads have been made in several New York communities, many buses, trains and subways do not yet accommodate cyclists and their bicycles without posing financial and logistical barriers. This improvement effort should also focus on those who cannot drive cars or do not own them, including children and the elderly. NYBC asks special attention be paid to:

a)      The use of bicycle and pedestrian impact statements on all major highway projects, including renovation projects;

b)      The classification of all streets in a municipality for bike use by age appropriateness, such as at age 6, 10 and 14;

c)      Dedicate funding to pay for the installation of secure bike holding areas in business areas, at mass transit hubs and by major rail stations;

d)      Allow bicyclists to qualify for benefits given to employers extending financial benefits to mass transit commuters;

e)      The eventual elimination of cycling barriers on all key bridges, and the consideration of bike lanes in any bridge reconstruction plans;       

f)       The reduction of logistical barriers preventing cyclists from loading their bikes on buses and trains, and financial assistance for transit systems, including Amtrak and intercity buses willing to develop accommodations for bicycles.

3)      Strengthen existing Transportation Enhancements, CMAQ and other TEA-21 programs for improved bicycling facilities; We believe existing programs to develop cycling facilities should be enhanced and expanded. To that end, eligibility for bicycling improvements should be more explicit; and incentives should encourage the use of funds for bicycle projects. This funding has been used and should continue to be used to:

a)      Plan and implement extensive bike routes. For instance, to date no full-scale effort has been mounted to create end-to-end bike routes in the NY-NJ region. Monies should be directed towards an effort to do this and similar projects elsewhere in New York State;

b)      Accelerate completion of the Buffalo to Albany Erie Canal bike path;

c)      Map and sign all of the major bikeways through the state to make them safer and more attractive to local users and tourists, including routes from:

i)        Buffalo to Albany

ii)       Jamestown to Hudson

iii)     Niagara to Erie, PA

iv)     Plattsburgh to Syracuse

v)      Manhattan to Montauk

vi)     Manhattan to Bear Mountain (West side of Hudson)

vii)   Manhattan to Poughkeepsie

viii)  Croton Harmon to the Shawangunks and Kingston

ix)     Poughkeepsie to Saugerties and Tannersville

x)      Binghamton to Ithaca

xi)     Syracuse to Oswego

xii)   Albany to Saratoga

xiii)  And others as identified by bike groups around the state

 

d)      Allocate adequate funding to upstate localities to develop cycling paths amenable to tourism. Funding should also allocate monies to install appurtenances such as map kiosks, benches, and water fountains along the paths.

 

e)      Continue to earmark and preserve old rail lines for bike use, while also increasing funding for the connection of discontinuous paths and rail trails (such as the rail trail in Nyack, NY).

f)       Strengthen the eligibility of bicycle projects in all highway funding so that National Highway Safety funding can be used within and across National Highways; and CMAQ funding can be used for local and metropolitan projects;

g)      Include a representative from major bicycle and pedestrian organizations in the metropolitan and state long-range transportation planning process;

h)      Support research that will enable us to reach an average 8% reduction in cyclist and pedestrian deaths per year. These accidents now cause 5,500 deaths per year and countless injuries.

4)      Create major bike and pedestrian routes for all cities and towns in the event of an emergency; The National Transportation Security Act must account for regional emergencies that might cause panic. For instance, sabotage of power plants or subways can shut down mass transit. In suburban areas, many people escaping at once can create motorized gridlock. We need to define in advance clear and safe methods for non-motorized emergency movement of people across large areas. Funding should be allocated for the development, advertising and training of New York residents for quick evacuation. NYBC also asks that TEA-3 provide funding and direction for the development of bike and pedestrian “corridors”. Specifically, we are asking that the new bill allocate funding to:

a)      Create an explicit non-motorized component of evacuation plans for major Metropolitan areas;

b)      Prepare for those emergencies by the identification and remedy of potential pedestrian bottlenecks by assuring continuous, permanent byways for non-motorized evacuation.

c)      Maintain these byways so they are available for everyday pedestrian and cyclist use, assuring they will be passable in case of emergency;

d)      Provide for education of individuals, families, and the elderly in particular, for the use of the system.

5)      Use the rebuilding of the World Trade Center area as a nationwide model for accommodation of cycling commuters. The rebuilding of the WTC site is an ideal opportunity to demonstrate how large complexes such as office parks, transportation hubs, and other traffic generators can accommodate and encourage bicycling commuting. The new bill should allocate specific funding to:

a)      Create enclosed secure holding stations or parking areas for bicycles that allow for short term storage at major buildings and at transport stations in the area;

b)      Build a modest system of cycling byways and paths within the site that can be expanded with increased demand;

c)      Provide for the connection of the WTC area to existing bike lanes and bikeways; Fill all gaps in the system of bikeways and bike lanes from the top of Manhattan to the WTC site;

d)      Assure safe and seamless bike connections to the other NYC boroughs: Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens, and the Bronx.

Using bicycles for transportation and recreation is the wave of the future for Americans, as we fight rising gasoline costs, extreme traffic congestion, cancer-producing pollution, and obesity. The New York Bicycling Coalition believes its objectives for TEA-21 will make for a better transportation program, benefiting both the nation’s and New York’s pedestrians and bicyclists. TEA-21 and its immediate predecessors have opened opportunities for meeting their needs, and have made enormous strides. Yet there is still so much more to be done. 

Many cyclists and pedestrians continue to report that they still do not feel safe riding and walking from their homes to work or school, and more and more children have abandoned their bikes because of parent’s safety concerns.  NYBC hopes that the energy and funding this nation can dedicate to realizing safe and accessible transportation alternatives will help bring about this improved vision for the future.

For questions, please contact Ivan Vamos, Legislative Director, at 518-436-0889

##############################

> >E NY Bikes Updates Archive

Did You Know?
Board Development

NYBC is actively seeking new board members and volunteers. We welcome activists, planners, and representatives from the private sector

Interested in becoming part of NYBC's leadership? Send an email to:
Bill Eisenreich, President
ikesbike@optonline.net

Interested in Volunteering? Send an email to:
Joshua Poppel, Executive Director
joshua@nybc.net