Complete the George Washington Bridge

Filed Under: Advocacy & Policy, Bike Friendly Cities
Post By: jwilson
Posted On: April 13, 2015
This opinion piece provided by NYBC member club NYCC does not reflect the official position of the New York Bicycling Coalition.

Imagine a region with 10 million residents separated by a mile-wide river.  One side is densely urban, the other mostly suburban.  Having placed a priority on bicycle travel, the two sides plan to spend $2 billion over 20 years to build out their respective bicycle networks.

Now imagine that the only way to cycle from one side of the river to the other is across a 1930’s-era bridge that crowds bikes and pedestrians together on a single sidewalk.

Unfortunately, this scenario illustrates actual present-day conditions in New York City and North Jersey.  The bridge is the George Washington, operated by the Port Authority.  If you’ve been on the bridge on a nice weekend, you know first-hand what the congestion and near-chaos are like.


Entrance to GWB South path at 178th & Cabrini.

So it could be good news that the GWB will soon undergo a vast once-in-a-century recabling program, a $1 billion, 10-year project that will rip out and restore the north and south bike/ped paths. This would seem an ideal time — if not the only time — to expand its capacity for cyclists and pedestrians. Yet the Port Authority says that to save money on the project, the paths will be rebuilt to the same dimensions that already exist.

In December 2011, other New York Cycle Club members and I first learned about the recabling project.

We were alarmed that the Authority announced no plans to maintain access to bike, foot or wheelchair traffic for the duration of the recabling, nor to take the opportunity to upgrade the paths to support the growing demand.  In our view, these oversights were big mistakes — especially the latter.

Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 10.18.14 AM

Current GWB path. One 6.75′ wide path for pedestrians, runners and cyclists. Photo by Hassan Diop.

Accordingly, we initiated a campaign to secure ADA-compliant access for the duration of the recabling project and to urge PA to rebuild the paths according to national standards for high use. This campaign appeared both reasonable and natural, given the congestion on the bridge path, the extensive benefits to the region, and the Authority’s own statements and mandates on bicycle access.

In March 2014, the Authority responded that it would enhance the GWB Paths by upgrading the path entrances, removing the stairs on the North Path and adding anti-suicide barriers.  We applauded, and indeed had advised, these improvements.

But at the same time, the Authority announced that it would leave the main spans unchanged at 6.75′. That is less than half of the width recommended for a “high-use” facility.  If the bridge paths are overcrowded now, can you imagine what they will be like in 10 years — let alone in the decades to come?

Connecting 10 million residents and two of the most heavily biked corridors in the country — Hudson Greenway and Route 9W — through a single 6.75′ path, is like connecting two fire hoses with a straw!

Screen Shot 2014-06-20 at 6.43.29 PM

Port Authority’s Plan: One (1) 6.75′ path for pedestrians-runners and one (1) 6.75′ path for cyclists. Rendering by Amman & Whitney.

In December 2014, our campaign gained traction when Manhattan Community Board #12, representing some 200,000 residents near the GWB, voted unanimously to call on the Authority to “build out the paths comparable to what now exists on the Williamsburg Bridge.


Williamsburg Bridge: A highly successful, AASHTO-compliant design featuring one (1) 14′ path for pedestrians-runners plus one (1) 14′ path for cyclists.

Also in December, in response to PA’s Plan, we presented Authority commissioners with a Cyclists’ Proposal that employed prefabricated aluminum structures to upgrade the east-west approaches and augment the pedestrian paths with 10′ wide outboard bikeways and 9′ tall anti-suicide barriers.

The benefits of this proposal are that it would:

  • Ensure separate paths for pedestrians, runners and cyclists, sharply reducing conflicts between the users.
  • Incorporate a 9′ high anti-suicide barrier, while maintaining unobstructed views from the pedestrian path.
  • Carve a second path through the towers to spare cyclists from negotiating the blind turns that already cause so many conflicts.

The Cyclists’ Proposal calls for a facility that conforms to national guidelines for high use (AASHTO); can support increased demand by all users well into the century (FHWA); and fulfills USDOT expectations that  transportation agencies upgrade bicycle-pedestrian facilities on bridges during major renovations.

Screen Shot 2015-03-14 at 10.21.14 AM

Cyclists’ Proposal: Two (2) 6.75′ paths for pedestrians-runners and (2) 10′ paths for cyclists. The 9′ high anti-suicide barrier is set flush to existing railing to preserve pedestrians’ view. Rendering by Joseph Lertola.

Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 7.36.03 AM

PA’s Plan will not remedy the paths’ blind turns, a source of frequent conflicts.

Following this presentation, three PA commissioners asked that the Cyclists’ Proposal be vetted internally.

In January 2015, we met with PA engineers, who seemed to corroborate (or at least never questioned) the Proposal’s benefits.  Nor were any elements deemed technically unfeasible or “off the table.”  To the contrary, PA’s engineers affirmed that the Authority could widen the GWB paths at any time, except that “other projects required funds.”

That last point begs the question: When will come a time that other projects don’t require funds?  The GWB is expected to gross $700 million in 2015 alone, many times what it would take to fund the work.

And what level of user demand would trigger a buildout?   Peak use on the GWB paths already exceeds 600 users per hour — twice the AASHTO threshold for a “high-use” facility. And with it  growing at 7.2% per year, we’ll reach AASHTO-times-four by 2024, the same year the recabling is done.  Certainly, if the renovated bridge generates increased demand as is expected.

But by then, the low-cost opportunity to upgrade the paths will be gone forever, consigning generations of cyclists to walk the span and crippling the growth of cycling across the region for a century.

Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 4.09.33 PM

Atlantic Beach Bridge. One (1) 6′ path for pedestrians. Photo by John T. Chiarella.